House approves voter ID after long debate over voter fraud, student IDs

By: - December 6, 2018 5:30 am
Republican Rep. David Lewis said the goal of the bill was to create the ‘gold standard’ in election integrity. Democrats didn’t buy it.

It was clear during two hours of debate Wednesday where the two political parties at the legislature diverged over photo ID: their belief in voter fraud.

The GOP supermajority expectedly passed legislation that would implement a constitutional requirement that voters must show a photo ID to cast an in-person ballot. Their intention with Senate Bill 824, they reiterated in the floor debate, was to prevent voter fraud.

“To be clear, our goal is to obtain the gold standard in election integrity,” said Rep. David Lewis (R-Harnett).

He likened voter fraud to speeding and said many people do it knowing they probably won’t be caught with a police force that’s spread too thin.

“It’s nearly impossible to catch,” he added of voter fraud. “Today, we can make our election process more secure. This bill will ensure, or at least go one step further, in making sure every North Carolinian has full faith in our system.”

Democrats didn’t buy it. They balked at the idea of voter fraud and asked their colleagues on the other side of the aisle to cite proof that the problem was as rampant as they were making it out to be. Republicans didn’t have definitive proof, claimed multiple Democratic lawmakers, only headlines and anecdotes.

“There’s nothing more clear to me at this point than voter suppression,” said Rep. Mickey Michaux Jr. (D-Durham) of the voter ID measure. “There’s been no fraud.”

Rep. Mickey Michaux

Michaux, who has been a prominent voting rights advocate all his life, said SB 824 was just another impediment to dissuade people from voting like the literacy tests and poll tests imposed on voters in the past that disenfranchised African Americans.

He also criticized Republicans for pointing to states that already had a voter ID law as having higher voter turnout among people of color in the last election, and said North Carolina did also without voter ID.

“It’s all in the eye of the beholder,” he said. “You all were elected to a supermajority without photo ID. I didn’t hear anybody claim fraud when that happened or even indicate fraud when that happened.”

Michaux added that the biggest fraud on the system was with absentee voting, referring to what’s currently being investigated by the State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement in Bladen County involving the 9th congressional district.

He also vowed to keep working to improve voting rights if SB 824 passed.

“If we have to go back to the streets again to get an impediment-free right to vote, then I’ll spend the rest of my life doing it,” he said.

The final version of the bill passed by the House – which still has to be approved again by the Senate – included several Democratic amendments. Those included expanding the definition of “reasonable impediments” to include natural disasters declared by state and or federal governments (as opposed to only both) and requiring state voter photo ID cards to print this disclaimer: “Expiration of this voter photo identification card does not automatically result in the voter’s voter registration becoming inactive.”

Rep. Pricey Harrison (D-Guilford) thanked Lewis for working with the Democrats to make the voter ID bill better, but she said she couldn’t vote for it in the end because it was rushed and she disagreed that there was a voter fraud problem in North Carolina.

“I think there are a lot of folks who are going to be disenfranchised,” she said, adding that those would likely disproportionately be people of color, low-income individuals, the young and the elderly. “In-person voter fraud, if it exists, is the smallest problem in this state.”

Harrison said she also heard from many of her constituents who said they wished there was more opportunity for public comment.

Several Republicans have made a point to say there was ample public input into SB 824, but there were only three hearings – one of which only included comment from four people who only had one minute each to speak.

One piece of public input that was taken into account and accepted by lawmakers was the recommendation to include all student IDs from public and private universities and community colleges. The final bill ultimately included a provision that approves the use of student ID’s so long as schools issuing them make use of procedures prescribed by the Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement.

Rep. Larry Pittman

Rep. Larry Pittman (R-Cabarrus) stirred quite a debate when he introduced an amendment to strip any ability for student IDs to be used for voting.

He said he didn’t see any justification for it and Rep. Michael Speciale (R-Beaufort, Craven, Pamlico) piggybacked and said allowing student IDs for voting would defeat the whole purpose of a photo ID law.

“There’s no reliability on those student IDs, none whatsoever,” Speciale said.

He added that he had a fake student ID he ordered off of the Internet from Wake Technical Community College and encouraged other lawmakers to take a look at it.

The amendment ultimately failed, but it did have some traction among Republicans who thought the bill wasn’t secure or strict enough.

Rep. Jonathan Jordan (R-Ashe, Watauga) voted against the entire bill because he said it didn’t adequately assess election security and approved a “breathtakingly wide array” of entities that could issue acceptable photo IDs.

He was the only Republican who voted against SB 824. Two Democrats voted for the bill: Rep. Duane Hall (D-Wake) and Rep. Ken Goodman (Hoke, Montgomery, Richmond, Robeson, Scotland).

A fiscal note attached to the bill Tuesday shows that it would cost $17 million over five years to implement. The bill goes back to the Senate for a concurrence vote. If it’s approved, it is subject to the Governor’s veto.

Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.