No, undocumented immigrants don’t commit more crime. Research shows they commit a lot less

By: - August 3, 2021 12:02 pm

Photo: Getty Images

New study undermines claims of a dangerous border

It’s an article of faith in some corners of politics and the media: All those undocumented immigrants crossing the southern border are making crime much worse in the United States.

But new research gives the lie to that assertion. And, some border officials say, continuing to promote it will only lead to another racist massacre like the one that occurred in El Paso two years ago today.

The notion that undocumented immigrants bring crime has a healthy pedigree.

Former President Donald Trump in 2015 said, “They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists.”

Referring to “the staggering number” of “perpetrators of state and federal crimes,” the governors of Texas and Arizona in June appealed to all other states to send their cops to the border to help. Their counterparts in Ohio, Iowa and Nebraska complied. Ohio’s state troopers, at least, are still in Texas.

One problem, though: Peer-reviewed, largely overlooked research published in December shows that undocumented immigrants in Texas likely aren’t part of a crime wave. In fact, they’re much less likely to be arrested for serious crimes than are people born in the United States.

Between 2012 and 2018, U.S.-born people were twice as likely as the undocumented to be arrested for violent crime in Texas and two-and-a-half times as likely to be arrested for drug crimes.

Despite many politicians’ claims new research shows undocumented immigrants commit crimes in Texas at much lower rates than the native born. Graphic from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Some surprises

Michael T. Light, a University of Wisconsin criminologist who was the lead author of the study, said there was a longstanding consensus in his field that immigrants tend to be less crime prone. But there wasn’t any research specifically addressing criminality among undocumented immigrants, he said.

“We basically had to wring our hands and hem and haw” when asked about crime by the undocumented, Light said in an interview last week. But then Light and colleagues Jingying He and Jason P. Robey discovered that the Texas Department of Public Safety included immigration status in its crime data.

That created a big opportunity.

“This is an area I’ve been researching for awhile — immigration and crime — so this isn’t an area that’s new to me,” Light said. “What’s new is that we had some really unique and detailed data to answer some basic questions, foundational questions, about what is the relative crime rate of undocumented immigrants relative to other groups.”

What they found was in some ways striking.

While the researchers didn’t expect that undocumented immigrants would commit more violent crime, they suspected the undocumented might commit more property crimes like theft because their economic opportunities can be meager. Instead, the researchers found that undocumented immigrants committed property crimes at 23% the rate of native-born people and 40% the rate of documented immigrants.

That might show that undocumented immigrants are more concerned with the consequences of arrest than they are motivated to steal, Light said.

“They may be thinking, ‘I’m going to get deported if I have run-ins with the law,” he said.

Partisan claims

The data in the report run directly counter to the statements of many politicians — including some in Ohio. For example, former state Treasurer Josh Mandel is running in a nasty Republican primary to succeed Sen. Rob. Portman, a Republican who is retiring next year.

“The left wants open borders and lawlessness to create more chaos at the border,” Mandel said in a July 19 tweet with a photo of a Texas state trooper standing in front of a line of apparently undocumented immigrants. “Let’s put America First, FINISH THE WALL and enforce our LAWS!”

Several Republican politicians in North Carolina have made claims along similar lines. In a May 21 letter voicing his opposition to so-called “sanctuary cities,” Sen. Thom Tillis warned of the prospect of allowing “dangerous, violent criminal aliens to walk the street without fear of deportation.” In April, North Carolina congressman Madison Cawthorn introduced legislation that would turn the unfinished border wall into a national monument.

As governor of Texas, Greg Abbott might be expected to know better, but earlier this summer, he held a press conference saying he would work to complete Trump’s border wall. The embattled Republican said, “What has changed is the carnage that is being caused by the people coming across the border.”

The Austin American-Statesman rated the claim “false,” but that didn’t stop Abbott and Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey from claiming in June that this year’s surge to the border created “threats to private property and to the safety of our citizens” as they asked other states to send their cops. Ohio Gov. Mike Dewine was among those who complied.

Raw numbers

Texas authorities have for years been making flimsy claims about lawlessness at the border that local law enforcement has angrily denied. But the Department of Public Safety, the director of which is appointed by the governor, seems unlikely to consider the University of Wisconsin study — even though it was done using the department’s own data.

The department’s Texas Border Crime and Other Criminal Activity Report for 2020 sounds ominous, saying, “Border crime impacts all areas of Texas. As the data contained in these pages demonstrates, criminal illegal aliens account for a significant number of serious offenses in Texas.”

But then it seems to give away the game by cautioning that it’s only giving raw numbers and no context.

“The report does not imply that unlawfully present individuals commit crime at a higher rate than citizens, it simply provides a count of the Texas arrests of individuals who are not legally present in the United States,” it says. “These criminals harm Texans and affect our safety and security.”

Light, the criminologist who analyzed DPS data, said such that using raw numbers instead of crime rates can lead to mistaken conclusions.

“Looking at raw numbers even five years ago, you could have concluded that Detroit was safer than New York,” he said. “And having been born in Detroit, (I know) that’s wildly inaccurate.”

One can’t know if Texas public safety officials are trying to create a false impression that undocumented immigrants are dangerous, but raw numbers regarding border crime get a special emphasis — at least on the agency’s website.

The border crime report was published in May. Its “Border Security Statistics” are up to date through June. But its Crime in Texas report is only up to date through 2019.

Proper priorities?

The Department of Public Safety didn’t respond last week when asked if it gave undue emphasis to crimes related to the border and why it didn’t post Light’s analysis on its website. But a cursory look at public sources suggests that it — and officials in Ohio and other states — might be better advised to focus their attention and resources elsewhere.

Laredo, population 266,000, sits smack-dab on the border. It had 12 murders in 2020. Lubbock, population 264,000, is about 300 miles from the border. It had 41 murders last year.

Toledo, Ohio, population 276,000, is about 1,500 miles away. It had 61  — or five times as many murders as Laredo — in 2020.

Similarly, Greensboro, population 291,000, is just over 1,400 miles from the Texas-Mexico border. It also experienced 61 murders in 2020.

Yet DeWine’s spokesman last week insisted that the border was an appropriate destination for Ohio law enforcement.

“We are confident in (the Ohio State Highway Patrol’s) ability to provide support services, and that the citizens of Ohio will continue to be provided with the same level of service,” DeWine Press Secretary Dan Tierney said in an email.

Special treatment

Meanwhile, Abbott’s inconsistency toward undocumented immigrants continues.

With coronavirus cases on the rise, the Texas governor last week signed an executive order banning local governments from implementing masking or vaccine requirements to fight the pandemic.

At almost the same time, he signed an order instructing state troopers to stop cars if they suspect they’re carrying migrants who might have the virus and turn them back to Mexico. The Texas Tribune reported Abbott as saying the immigrant order “will reduce the risk of COVID-19 exposure in our communities.” 

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland sent Abbott a letter declaring the coronavirus order “dangerous and unlawful” and threatened to sue.

Texas state Sen. Cesar Blanco said all the scapegoating has harmed the border’s overwhelmingly Hispanic population in the past and will again if it continues. The El Paso Democrat referred to an Aug. 3, 2019, massacre in which a Dallas-area 21-year-old posted a racist screed and then drove to El Paso, killing 23 and injuring 23 others.

“El Paso is a border town and was recently ranked as the fourth safest large city in America,” Blanco said in an email. “The rhetoric around immigration, including calling immigrants criminals, is dangerous and wrong. As we come up on the second anniversary of the Walmart shooting, El Paso knows firsthand what that rhetoric can drive people to do.”

Marty Schladen is a reporter for the Ohio Capital Journal, which first published this story. NC Policy Watch staff also contributed.

Read Schladen’s previous reports from Texas on the deployment of Ohio National Guard troops to the border here and here.


Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.